Search

Login

 

ANGLICAN BLOGS  AND WEB SITES

1662 Book of Common Prayer Online

1928 Book of Common Prayer Online

Alastair's Adversaria

American Anglican Council

American Anglican Council Videos on the 39 Articles

Anglican Bible and Book Society

An Anglican Bookshelf (List of recommended Anglican books)

Anglican Church in North America

Anglican Expositor

Anglican Mission in the Americas

Anglican Mom

An Anglican Priest

Anglican.net

Anglican Pastor

Anglican Radio

Anglican Rose

Anglicanly Speaking

A BCP Anglican

The Book of Common Prayer (Blog of Photos)

The Book of Common Prayer (Online Texts)

The Church Calendar

Church Society

Classical Anglicanism:  Essays by Fr. Robert Hart

Cogito, Credo, Petam

Colorado Anglican Society

CommonPrayer.org

The Conciliar Anglican

The Conciliar Anglican's YouTube Channel

(The Old) Continuing Anglican Churchman

(The New) Continuing Anglican Churchman

The Continuum

Convictional Anglican

Drew's Views

The Evangelical Ascetic

Free Range Anglican

The Hackney Hub

Jesse Nigro's Thoughts

The Latimer Trust

New Scriptorium (Anglican Articles and Books Online)

The Old High Churchman

Prayer Book Anglican

The Prayer Book Society, USA

Project Canterbury

Prydain

Reformed Catholicism

Reformed Episcopal Church

The Ridley Institute

River Thames Beach Party

The Secker Society

Society of Archbishops Cranmer and Laud

Stand Firm

Texanglican

The Theologian

The World's Ruined

Three Streams

TitusOneNine

To All The World

Trinity House Blog

United Episcopal Church of North America

Virtue Online

Wyclif

HUMOR 

Bad Vestments

The Low Churchman's Guide to the Solemn High Mass

Lutheran Satire

REFORMED AND LUTHERAN SITES AND BLOGS

1517: The Legacy Project

The Book of Concord

The Calvinist International

Christianae Apologetica

Concordia Theology

Curlew River

The Davenant Trust

Ded Orthodox Zeppelin

Gottesdienst Online

The Gospel Coalition

Higher Things

Just and Sinner

Kuyperian Commentary

Monergism

Post-Reformation Digital Library

Pseudepigrapha

Reformation 21

Reformation 500

Theology Like a Child

Triablogue

"WORSHIP WARS"

Ponder Anew: Discussions about Worship for Thinking People

OTHER SITES AND BLOGS, MANLY, POLITICAL AND WHATNOT

Abbeville Institute Blog

Art of the Rifle

The Art of Manliness

Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture

Church For Men

Craft Beer

Cranmer

First Things

Jihad Watch

Joffre the Giant: Excursions in Christian Virility

Mercurius Pragmaticus Redivivus

Mere Comments

The Midland Agrarian

Midwest Conservative Journal

Numavox Records (Music of Kerry Livgen & Co.)

The Pipe Smoker

Project Appleseed (Basic Rifle Marksmanship)

Turnabout

What's Wrong With The World: Dispatches From The 10th Crusade

WOMEN'S ORDINATION TO THE PRIESTHOOD

Essays on the Ordination of Women to the Priesthood from the Episcopal Diocese of Ft. Worth

Homo Hierarchicus and Ecclesial Order

Packer: Let's Stop Making Women Presbyters

Lewis: Priestesses in the Church?

Streams of the River: Articles Outlining the Arguments Against the Ordination of Women to the Priesthood

Mascall: Women Priests?

Powered by Squarespace
Categories and Monthly Archives
This area does not yet contain any content.

       Death to the Beast

 

 

                           Click for music.  Player will open on separate page.              

           Celebrating 400 Years of Anglicanism in America at the Old Jamestown Church

Saturday
May162015

Two New Bishops Consecrated for the Anglican Mission in the Americas

On May 2 at St. Luke's Lutheran Church in Oviedo, Florida, the Very Rev. Gerald Lee Schnackenberg and the Very Rev. Carl Eugene Buffington, Jr. were consecrated as Bishop Emissaries for AMiA by the Rt. Rev. William Mugenyi of the Diocese of Boga, Anglican Church of the Congo, the Rt. Reverend Masimango Katanda of the Diocese of Kindu, Anglican Church of the Congo, and the Rt. Reverend Sospeter T. Ndenz, Diocese of Kibondo, Anglican Church of Tanzania.  A couple of years ago, then Fr. Gerry Schnackenberg gave his approval for me to enter into a discernment process for holy orders in AMiA, so for me personally his consecration is very poignant.  Congratulations to Bishops Schnackenberg and Buffington, and may God richly bless their ministry among us and to a world in dire need of the Gospel.  As the Orthodox would say at the consecration of a bishop, "Axioi!"

Unfortunately, the joy of the consecrations has been somewhat dampered by the re-ignition of the ACNA's old hostility toward AMiA, which we had hoped would be laid to rest after Archbishop Duncan's concilatory gestures toward AMiA last year.  The renewed hostility stems from a dust-up between the Primate of the Anglican Church of the Congo and the two consecrating bishops from that province over the consecrations, and certain folks deemed journalists in conservative Anglican circles are leveraging the dust-up in the Congolese church in order to score rhetorical points.  A particularly uncharitable display can be seen in May 13 episode of "Anglican Unscripted", which was given the lovely title, "The Mission's Zombies", featuring this puerile caption: "The Mission is not dead yet. . .booh!"  

If the childish title of this Anglican TV episode weren't enough to highlight the utter contempt for AMiA held by many in ACNA, the snarky content of the video dispels all doubt, as does the rapidity with which  the principals at Anglican TV rushed to judgment in taping and publishing this video.  They apparently did so without having heard "all sides of this story", as Fr. Conger acknowledges at 12:56 of the video.  Tsk.  It seems Mr. Kallsen and his Episcopalian (!) colleague Fr. Conger take no thought whatsoever about how this kind of careless and self-congratulatory commentary scandalizes and hurts many of the faithful, not only in AMiA, but even in their own provinces. 

Predictably, ACNA news gatherer and commentator David Virtue also chimed in on all this.  I left a comment at that discussion and provided a reference to a text from the Book of Acts for everyone's consideration.  It reads as follows:

When (the Pharisees) heard this, they were enraged and wanted to kill (the apostles). But a Pharisee in the council named Gamaliel, a teacher of the law held in honor by all the people, stood up and gave orders to put the men outside for a little while.  And he said to them, “Men of Israel, take care what you are about to do with these men.  For before these days Theudas rose up, claiming to be somebody, and a number of men, about four hundred, joined him. He was killed, and all who followed him were dispersed and came to nothing.   After him Judas the Galilean rose up in the days of the census and drew away some of the people after him. He too perished, and all who followed him were scattered.  So in the present case I tell you, keep away from these men and let them alone, for if this plan or this undertaking is of man, it will fail; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them. You might even be found opposing God.”  (Emphasis mine.)

Here in Colorado, the Colorado Anglican Society is seeking to transcend the old feud and work together for the cause of Anglican unity-in-diversity and the proclamation of the Gospel.   The Society's board is composed of clergy from ACNA, PEARUSA, and AMiA.  An example of what the Holy Spirit can do, provided we don't quench Him.

Now, I am just a simple deacon with little knowledge of or interest in the workings of bishops, including my own.  My chief concern is my diaconal ministry to the saints and to the suffering, not the messy and oftentimes sinful world of church politics, so you'll have to forgive me if this blog entry reflects a certain naïveté.  That being said, I think we as orthodox Anglicans in the process of realignment could spare ourselves -- and more importantly, our churches -- a lot of grief by adopting the Gamaliel Principle.  You would think that Anglicans might have learned that lesson from the tragic case of John Wesley. 

Unless, that is, it does turn out to be the case that Anglicanism is merely "about form and function", as Mr. Kallsen avers at 13:40 at the video.  Just ponder the implications of that statement, however, from a pneumatological point of view.

Sunday
Apr192015

Three Articles Worth Reading

Peter Vermigli on Episcopacy, from the Calvinist International.

Leaving home: The Future of the Faith in England, by Gavin Ashenden, a priest who left the Church of England for the Realignment.

The Faith of My Father, a former Baptist and now Anglican in response to a piece by Al Mohler.

Friday
Apr102015

For My Friend Stefano

Monday
Apr062015

An Anglo-Catholic Priest Emails Me Regarding the Thirty-Nine Articles

He writes,

Subject: 39 Articles of Religion
Message: From The Rev. Vernon Staley on the 39 Articles of Religion:

Many years ago for my catechism my priest used four books with us:  The Bible, the BCP, Wilson's "Faith and Practice," and Staley's "The Catholic Religion."  We are not Congegational or  Confessional.  We are Credal. The 39 AR makes us sound like we have a Confession.  The statements are the remnant of the Via Media of Eliz I.  I still read from TCR nearly weekly.  Here is what Fr. Staley had to say about the Articles of Religion:

The Catholic Religion

A MANUAL OF INSTRUCTION
FOR MEMBERS OF THE
Anglican Church
11th Edition, A.D. 1900

By The Reverend Vernon Staley

Part Fourth
APPENDIX

CHAPTER I, THE XXXIX ARTICLES, page 383-384

The Thirty-nine Articles are not Articles of Faith like the Creeds, and they are not imposed on members of the Anglican Church as necessary terms of communion.  The clergy only subscribe them, and the sense in which the subscription is understood, has been stated by Archbishop Bramhall as follows; “We do not hold our Thirty-nine Articles to be such necessary truths, ‘without which there is no salvation;’ nor enjoin ecclesiastic persons to swear unto them, but only to subscribe them, as theological truths, for the preservation of unity among us.  Some of them are the very same that are contained in the Creed; some others of them are practical truths, which come not within the proper list of points or articles to be believed; lastly, some of them are pious opinions or inferior truths which are proposed by the Church of England as not to be opposed; not as essentials of Faith necessary to be believed.” (1)  Bishop Bull wrote similarly, “The Church of England professeth not to deliver all her Articles as essentials of faith, without the belief whereof no man can be saved; but only propounds them as a body of safe and pious principles, for the preservation of peace to be subscribed, and not openly contradicted by her sons.  And, therefore, she requires subscription to them only from the clergy, and not from the laity.” (2)

“The Articles are to be subscribed to in the sense intended by those whose authority makes the subscription requisite.” (3)  It must always be remembered that the same Convocation, in the same set of Canons which first required subscription to the Articles, in 1571, enjoined that preachers should only teach “that which is agreeable to the doctrine of the Old and New Testaments, and that  which the Catholic fathers and ancient bishops have collected out of the same doctrine.”  “It seems” says Mr. Keble, “no violent inference, that the appointed measure of doctrine preached, was also intended to be the measure of doctrine delivered in the way of explanation of doubtful passages in formularies.” (4)


It is quite evident, therefore, that the Articles would be understood by the clergy who first subscribed them as Articles of Peace for the preservation of unity.  They were not religious tests, or Articles of Faith; they were made as comprehensive as possible, and they were to be interpreted and understood in accordance with the general rule of Catholic tradition, i.e., in the Catholic sense. (5)

(1)    Works, vol. ii, pp.201, 476.
(2)    A Vindication of the Church of England,  xxvii.
(3)    Keble’s Catholic Subscription to the xxxix. Articles, p. 13.
(4)    Ibid., p. 15.
(5)    “I understand by the Catholic sense, that sense which is most conformable to the ancient rule,  ‘Quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab amnibus.’” Ibid., p. 14.

Well, during my catechesis in the Anglican Catholic Church, I also read Staley's work, but as any number of posts here at OJC on the matter of Anglican formularies would show my reader, I eventally concluded that the typical Anglo-Catholic take on the Articles, as represented by Staley in this passage, begs the essential question as to the Articles' confessional status (and which is one of the reasons I left the ACC).  Most Anglo-Catholics say things to the effect of "we are not confessional, but credal."  The English Reformers, most Old High Churchman and Evangelical Anglicans say, "Not so.  We are both confessional and credal."  So there we are.  J.I. Packer, for instance, argues that the Articles are every bit as credal as the Nicene Creed.  Conversely, both are confessional documents.  The only Anglicans who deny that Anglicanism is a confessional faith are liberal and Anglo-Catholic revisionists.

Bishop H. Hensley Henson, no Evangelical he, had this to say about the Articles:

The raison d’etre of subscription to the Thirty-nine Articles is the necessity, in a divided Christendom, of agreeing on a version of the Catholic Faith. In the Articles we have the Anglican version of the Catholic tradition of Faith and Discipline. It is not open to any loyal Anglican to form any other.

Alike for negotiations with other branches of the Church, and for the instruction of its own members, some authoritative statement of specifically Anglican teaching and practice is really indispensable. Such an authoritative statement is provided by the Thirty-nine Articles, and, if they were abandoned, it would be necessary to provide a substitute.

So long as the Christian society is divided on issues so fundamental as to transcend even the interest of visible unity, separate Churches must exist, and must show cause for doing so. It would be manifestly intolerable that men should be authorized to minister as officers and teachers who did not assent to the doctrine and discipline of the Church which commissioned them. It would be not less intolerable if the parishioners were to possess no security against mere individualism on the part of the clergy. Therefore it seems to follow that Subscription is really indispensable, as well for the protection of the people as for the security of the Church.

When, however, we pass from theoretical considerations to the actual situation in the Church of England at the present time, we are confronted by a strange spectacle of doctrinal confusion which demonstrates the failure of Subscription to secure either of the two objects for which presumably it was designed. It does not provide any effective guarantee of the doctrinal soundness of the subscribing clergy, and it does not protect the people from heretical parsons. The Church of England, at the present time, exhibits a doctrinal incoherence which has no parallel in any other church claiming to be traditionally orthodox.  (The Church of England, pp.107 ff.)

I believe Henson hit the nail on the head with everything he said here: Anglicanism, as a local manifestation of the Catholic Church that agreed in the 16th century with the need for reform, sets forth authoritatively the Anglican understanding of the Catholic faith as expressed in the Articles, and, if they are to be abandoned, something else needs to take their place.  To the Anglo-Catholic, what needs to take their place is an unreformed Catholicism that purportedly bears the same character as the undivided church of the first millennium.  However, not every Anglican is on board with that agenda, so when my reader refers to "we" ("we are not confessional"), I must ask straightaway, "what's this 'we' $#*!"? ;)

Henson is also on the mark on how the abandonment of the Articles by liberals and Anglo-Catholics has led to the present state of doctrinal chaos in Anglicanism, and Anglican theologians such as Packer and Gillis Harp have argued that re-embracing the Articles, indeed read in a Catholic manner but WITHOUT washing out their Augustinian and Reformed content, can help to eliminate the doctrinal chaos that has long plagued our church.  At least Staley, unlike many AC's believed that Anglican clergy were required "to subscribe them, as theological truths, for the preservation of unity among us." (Emphasis mine.)

Sunday
Apr052015

Who Knew?

"I see Katherine Jefferts Schori, Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church, has said that we climate deniers are 'sinful'. Who knew the Episcopal Church still had sins?" - Mark Steyn

Wednesday
Apr012015

From J.I. Packer

It is important to know who our friends are. Anglo-Catholics generally believe in Trinity, Scripture, atonement, resurrection, judgement, prayer, etc. A ‘higher’ view of sacraments and priesthood seems secondary in the light of those primary correspondences. I can be friends with Anglo-Catholics. Modern Anglo-Catholicism has a different agenda from in the past. I can, with qualifications, be friends with Anglo-Catholics. I have good will towards Forward in Faith. Liberals are different, denying many of the aforementioned. We have let Liberals get away with too much with regard to leadership in the past.

Quoted here.

Wednesday
Apr012015

New to the Blogroll

Monday
Mar302015

Yet Another Eastern Orthodox Apologist Aspires to Correct Me

Thus far here, here and here, by one "Stefano", all today, March 29.  Given the somewhat frenetic pace and tone of his comments, I halfway expect more to be posted to blog entries in the Eastern Orthodoxy archive.  We'll see.  (Update, March 30.  Was I right, or what?)

I must confess that I am beginning to grow a little weary of exchanging volleys with the Orthodox, especially now that I've offered the olive branch of a new ecumenical bonhomie here at The Old Jamestown Church.   Predictably, Stefano's given us nothing but standard talking points, and I am not in a rush to respond.  I'll try to hammer out a response sometime after Holy Week.

Sunday
Mar292015

Could Newman Have Been Right About the Catholic Sense of the Articles?

This blogger thinks so.  It's a matter I intend to look into more seriously when time permits. 

On a related subject, when I peruse the web for what's going on in the "evangelical" world these days, I'm afraid the term "evangelical" means anything and nothing. I'd be tempted to abandon the term altogether were it not for the fact that it has a long and honored history in the Church, as it it is a cognate of the world "Gospel." Somehow we Evangelical Catholics need to reclaim it. I try to do it by telling people I'm an "old school" Evangelical and that by that I mean a Christian who believes the apostolic doctrines of grace as set forth in the great Protestant confessions, which doctrines not only cohere with but flow inexorably from the orthodox triadology and christology of the Catholic Church. For us old school Evangelicals, Creed and Confession go together. We can only be truly Evangelical if we are rooted in the Great Tradition.  That means being Catholic. 

I Believe in the Holy Catholic Church.

Sunday
Mar292015

Luther on Academic Theologians

To be read in conjuction with this.

"...the longer you write and teach the less you will be pleased with yourself. When you have reached this point, then do not be afraid to hope that you have begun to become a real theologian, who can teach not only the young and imperfect Christians, but also the maturing and perfect ones. For indeed, Christ’s church has all kinds of Christians in it who are young, old, weak, sick, healthy, strong, energetic, lazy, simple, wise, etc. If, however, you feel and are inclined to think you have made it, flattering yourself with your own little books, teaching, or writing, because you have done it beautifully and preached excellently; if you are highly pleased when someone praises you in the presence of others; if you perhaps look for praise, and would sulk or quit what you are doing if you did not get it -- if you are of that stripe, dear friend, then take yourself by the ears, and if you do this in the right way you will find a beautiful pair of big, long, shaggy donkey ears. Then do not spare any expense! Decorate them with golden bells, so that people will be able to hear you wherever you go, point their fingers at you, and say, “See, See! There goes that clever beast, who can write such exquisite books and preach so remarkably well.”
From Preface to the Wittenberg Edition of Luther’s German Writings (LW 34:285-88).
Thursday
Mar262015

The Old High Churchman on Anglicanism's Middle Way

UECNA's Presiding Bishop Peter Robinson has written yet another compelling article outlining why classical Anglicanism is neither "Catholicism with married priests", "Western Orthodoxy" nor the "English version of Calvinism."  Rather, 

In the end one has to accept that the Church of England, and thus the churches of the Anglican tradition, if they are going to be true to the historic formularies of the Church, have to concede that the core doctrinal position of the Church is Augustinianism, and lies somewhere between confessional Lutheranism, and confessional Calvinism in its particulars.

My own studies lead me toward a position that is very similar if not identical to the view His Grace defends in this article.

Tuesday
Mar242015

Holy Smokes

Tuesday
Mar172015

This Is Your Chant on Testosterone

And Bernard of Clairvaux was right.  Rise up.

Tuesday
Mar032015

Joel Wilhelm on the ACNA Task Force on Holy Orders

Will ACNA keep women's ordination or won't it?  Links to Wilhelm's previous two articles can be found at the end of this article.

Tuesday
Mar032015

A Reader Is Frustrated by the Problem of Anglican Identity

An Australian reader sent this to me in early February:

Can you please tell me how someone can be an Anglo-Catholic or High Church Anglican and believe in the 39 articles of faith and homilies? Isn’t there a conflict between the Catholic worship style with the real prescene in the Eucharist etc and the evangelical nature of the articles and homilies? I keep being told that to be Anglican is to be Catholic and Protestant but each parish seems to only focus on one. This is something I am struggling with and would like some help in understanding it.

My reader touches on several key issues in his query, but in order to give what I hope will be an adequate answer, those issues need to be teased out and examined.

First, there is the question of terminology with respect to the terms "Anglo-Catholic" and "High Church Anglican".  As Peter Nockles argues in his book The Oxford Movement in Context: Anglican High Churchmanship, 1760-1857,  the term "Anglo-Catholic" has historically been difficult to define with precision.  Read his comments here.

So it remains today.  "Anglo-Catholic" and "High Church Anglican" refer to different phenomena, but I personally know Anglican who call themselves "Anglo-Catholics" when they are really noting more than Old High Church Protestants.  And sometimes the term "High Church" is applied to the Tractarian Movement and its progeny, when it really shouldn't be.  I know Anglicans who call themselves "Anglo-Catholics", most of whom reject the 39 Articles but others who embrace them as Anglicanism's confession.  It's all very confusing.

The next issue concerns the authority of the Articles and the Book of Homilies.  There are many confessional Anglicans who question whether the Homilies should share the same degree of authority that the Articles.  I am one of them, for reasons I won't go into here. 

Next, there is the question of what is meant by "Catholic worship style".  I suppose whether something is "Catholic worship style" depends on the perspective of the observer.  Many Baptists take issue with what they perceive to be the "Catholic worship style" of Reformed and Presbyterian liturgies, whereas Anglo-Catholics and High Church Anglicans would consider those liturgies to be snake-belly low and hence very unCatholic.  My reader does explain that by that term he associates the doctrine of real presence.  But Lutherans believe in a version of real presence, and yet they are everywhere regarded as Protestants. 

Some Anglo-Protestants also believe in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, along with the Lutherans.  However, I have found that when some of these Anglicans refer to "real presence", they're really referring to the Calvinistic/Cranmerian view.  Ergo: more terminological confusion.

The bottom line is that I share the reader's frustration over the question of Anglican identity.   The various styles of churchmanship do tend to manifest themselves parish by parish.  Anglicanism being what it is, however, I think it's pretty much what we have to expect -- and live with, at least for the foreseeable future.

Saturday
Feb282015

Lent Begins

St. Peter's Anglican Church, Akaroa, New Zealand

My wife and I returned from New Zealand yesterday.  Other than being able to attend an Ash Wednesday service at St. Peter's Anglican Church in Akaroa, NZ (above photo), my Lent is off to a late start.  So, I've decided to enter into the season now that we're back in the States with this poem from an Anglican priest, which I shared last year and which I may share every year going forward, since it captures the true spirit of the season.  (In a tip of the hat to the Orthodox, I don't know how many times the Lenten spirit of Herrick's poem was stressed in the Lenten seasons of my 13-year stint in the Orthodox Church, regardless of the austerity of the Orthodox Lenten fast.  I even heard one story about an Orthodox priest who, in confession, counseled a man to drink copious amounts of beer during Lent to counter his judgmental spirit.):

TO KEEP THY LENT

BY Robert Herrick (1591-1647)

Is this a Fast, to keep
The larder lean?
And clean
From fat of veals and sheep?
Is it to quit the dish
Of flesh, yet still
To fill
The platter high with fish?
Is it to fast an hour,
Or ragg'd to go,
Or show
A downcast look and sour?
No: 'tis a Fast to dole
Thy sheaf of wheat
And meat
Unto the hungry soul.
It is to fast from strife
From old debate,
And hate;
To circumcise thy life.
To show a heart grief rent;
To starve thy sin,
Not bin;
And that's to keep thy Lent.

Wednesday
Feb252015

Sons of Liberty International

I humbly request that all my readers donate to this worthy organization.  It is legal to do so.

Sons of Liberty International (SOLI)

 

Monday
Feb162015

Nineveh Plains Protection Units

It's all well and good for us to lament for our brethren by posting cries of "Lord have mercy" on Facebook, quoting Scriptures about the reality of martyrdom in this world, and stressing the need to pray for them.  As the Christian militiaman Gabriel says in the video below from The Patriot, "Yes, PRAY for them, but HONOR them as well by taking up arms to fight with us."  We here in the free West need to honor them by supporting them materially as well as spiritually.  That means we need to send bodies, arms and money.  When I get back from New Zealand I plan to research these groups and how, provided they are graft free,  Christians can do so. So far I have found only this: Iraqi Christians Form Anti-ISIS Militia, and You Can Legally Chip In.

Thursday
Feb052015

Iraq’s Christians Take Up Arms to Fight Islamic State

Tuesday
Feb032015

Jadis Takes One in the Teeth